Search the site

  

Grab my RSS feed | (What's this?)

About...

Joe Riley

Joe Riley is arts editor, columnist and leader writer for the Liverpool ECHO. The Life of Riley is a wry look at existence - local, national and international (and occasionally into outer space) - as seen by the UK's senior serving arts critic and the ECHO's longest-serving journalist.

Tag cloud...

Sponsored links

Recent Posts

Feeds

Categories

Useful links

Archives

Sponsored links

Latest Posts...

A Resignation Issue - But For Whom Does The Bell Toll?

Posted by Joe Riley on August 2, 2007 1:19 PM | 

In view of today's extraordinary news - the cancellation of the Mathew Street festival - I have postponed a blog on the subjects flagged up in today's ECHO regarding high court sentencing and theology (will return to those at a later date, no doubt).
Instead, the all-consuming issue is the fiasco of the Mathew Street Festival.

All too often nowadays, particularly in national politics and sport, we hear of calls for resignations following some almighty mistake.
This is not always necessary.
But it becomes so, if a particular issue is likely to so impinge on the general perception of an individual or organisation that it is likely to affect the way it or they are perceived on a permanent basis.
That - and that foremost - is the reason why the failure to stage a Mathew Street Festival at such a late stage - must be a resignation issue.
It is a social, financial, political and public relations disaster beyond our imagining.
It would be impossible to do worse damange to Liverpool's internaitonal profile, with tens of thousands of tourists booked and paid up to visit from all parts of the world.
The mind boggles how 100 people working full-time at enourmous expense managed to irreversibly destroy their credibility.
This worldwide blog will hopefully broadcast the lack of confidence we in Liverpool now hold in those who have allowed this situation to develop ( I say that as the city's arts editor for 36 years).
These duffers will be for ever tainted - right through 2008 and beyond into the history books - with the consequences of their costly and ultimately unproductive strategy concerning Europe's largest free music festival.
But exactly who should go? The chief executive of the council, the council leader, or the head of the culture company? One or all? For all must accept a degree of blame for this monumental error of judgement, which has brought such a disasterous result.
What we have seen demonstrated is a masterclass in incompetence.
Certainly, in most walks of commercial life, heads would roll.
There is no reason whatsoever to argue otherwise in this case.
If they have people to speak in their defence, then they had better produce them quickly.
For both the council and the culture company, this is the day of reckoning - and from where I sit it's been a long time coming.

Comments (2)

Elliott wrote...

Joe,

I wouldn't be surprised if many go along for the Bank Holiday Weekend, anyway. In particular, those who are coming from abroad & have already made arrangements.

If H&S is Liverpool Council's reason, then it's not a very good one. The council's actions are highly irresponsible, as a higher-than-average number of people will still, no doubt, be gathering in the area, without sufficient supervision (medical, police etc.) - something which would've been catered for, previously.

Posted by: Elliott  | August 2, 2007 2:38 PM

Geoffrey Crayon wrote...

Yes Joe you're right.

'Resign!' is overused. So is 'worse than useless' but both would be timely here.

We know in this city that when LibDem leaders resign they don't resign very far so that's probably a non-starter but there certainly needs to be a purge at the Culture Company and attention given to its ambiguous council/company status.

What also needs looking at is the governance and approach to cultural leadership we've seen fail so badly here. I'd suggest that this is not just a Liverpool issue and we might do others a service by addressing it.

What we've seen here has alarming points of similarity to the assumptions than underpin central government's Cultural Leadership programme - that visionary functionaries should be given their head unencumbered by procedure or operational attention to detail.

A recent article in The Stage with Margaret Hodge suggests that the milking of regeneration quangos is very much part of the new regimes arts strategy.

In Liverpool, further along that path than most, we have almost a duty to learn what has gone wrong and let the world know in sane and measured terms.


Posted by: Geoffrey Crayon  | August 5, 2007 11:44 PM

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)